We can now draw parallels between the person in love and the latently motivated. Both are very keen on establishing contact and very indirect in their gambits (according to this line of reasoning we assume that the person in love is manifestly motivated). For the person in love, his testing is complex because the relationship … [Read more…]
The more demotivation an individual has, the more he depends on and gravitates toward others, but demotivation also means he becomes more asocial, that is to say, more destructive towards others. His own needs are put first and his focus is on receiving rather than giving. This is how we can identify it as a … [Read more…]
The contact rebuses of the manifestly motivated are very much more constructive than destructive, the pain mostly being openly exhibited with a small residue being transmuted in the form of demotivation. Thus we can say that the individual has a constructive contact rebus (Motivational Work, Values and Theory, Part 1, pages 237 – 277) Nevertheless, … [Read more…]
The transmutation of a contact rebus serves to plant clues within it, clues that an observant target will interpret as a genuinely positive gambit. These clues indicate that transmutation has occurred and occasionally reveal just what has been transmuted. However, those possessing the greatest ability to detransmute the contact rebus are independent third parties or … [Read more…]
We can gain further insights into the nature of the contact rebus by examining the principles of transmutation. Our previous examples of romantic liaisons and the bonding of children and teenagers with their parents highlight three different governing principles that exist apart from the degree of motivation. For this reason, we can call them neutral … [Read more…]
You must be logged in to post a comment.